Negotiating Boundaries - The Plural Fields of Art History
Speakers:
Robert Bagley, Styles, Periods and the Life Cycle of the Goblin, (Princeton University)
Alice Donohue, History and the Historian of Ancient Art, (Bryn Mawr College, Pennsylvania)
Laura Camille Agoston (Trinity University, San Antonio )
Priyanka Basu (St Norbert College, Wisconsin)
Colleen Becker (Columbia University)
Laura Breen (University of Westminster)
Lesley Brubaker (University of Birmingham)
Antoinette Friedenthal (Independent Scholar)
Jannis Galanopoulos and Georgia Metaxa (University of Crete)
Jack Hartnell (The Courtauld Institute of Art, London)
Sandy Heslop and Joanne Clarke (Sainsbury Institute for Art, East Anglia)
Stefan Muthesius (University of East Anglia)
Meredith Nelson-Berry (Brad Graduate Centre, New York)
Heike Neumeister (Birmingham City University)
Amalia Papaioannou (Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne University)
The formation of art history as a discipline was underpinned by the claim to a special area of expertise which, in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries, was accompanied by the development of particular concepts and methods, from the formal and spatial analysis of Wölfflin, Riegl or Schmarsow to the iconology of Panofsky. Linked to the emergence of the concept of autonomous art, the establishment of the discipline was achieved by means of certain exclusions; a rigid line of demarcation was drawn between art history and archaeology, aesthetic judgments were deemed irrelevant and, in a mirroring of Kantian thought, the decorative and applied arts became the objects of a separate, less prestigious, domain of inquiry.
For all the recent talk of interdisciplinarity, these exclusions still shape the terrain of scholarship, producing numerous incongruities. Art historians still seldom discuss the applied arts, while in the Anglophone world architectural history remains a separate subject (with its own professional and discursive institutions). Prehistoric art and the art of the classical worlds are still topics mostly of interest for archaeologists rather than art historians, while the division between fine art and the applied arts has produced a caesura between the ‘traditional’ and the ‘modern’ in the historiography of, for example, the art of the Islamic world or China.
This conference is not concerned with calling for a renewed embrace of interdisciplinary thinking, but rather with considering the implications of the status quo. Why are certain art historical topics still the domain of researchers in other disciplines? What are the consequences?
Programme
Monday 1st July
10.00–11.15 Registration
11.15-11.30 Introduction
11.30- 12.45 KEYNOTE SPEAKER
Robert Bagley (Princeton), Styles, Periods and the
Life Cycle of the Goblin
12.45-13.40 LUNCH
PANEL 1
13.40-14.20 Priyanka Basu (St Norbert College, Wisconsin), Ornament and Art
History’s Boundaries, circa 1900
14.20-15.00 Sandy Heslop and Joanne Clarke (Sainsbury Institute for Art,
East Anglia), Basketry, Pottery and the Origins of Decoration: the Fate of
Gottfried Semper’s Bekleidungstheorie
15.00-15.40 Laura Breen (University of Westminster), Redefining Ceramics
Through Exhibitionary Practice
15.40-16.00 TEA
PANEL 2
16.00-16.40 Antoinette Friedenthal (Independent Scholar, Berlin), John
Smith, his Catalogue Raisonné of the Works of the Most Eminent Dutch,
Flemish, and French Painters (1829-1842) and “the stigma of picture dealer”
16.40-17.20 Amalia Papaioannou (Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne University), How
Interdisciplinary Thinking (or lack thereof) Shaped the Evolution of.
Periodstyle in Art History: the case of the “goût à la grecque”
17.20-18.00 Stefan Muthesius (University of East Anglia), Towards
Authenticity: The rise of the antique applied art object in the later 19th
century.
Tuesday 2nd July
9.30 – 10.45 KEYNOTE SPEAKER
Alice Donohue (Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania), History
and the Historian of Ancient Art
PANEL 3
11.10- 11.50 Meredith Nelson-Berry (Bard Graduate Centre, New York),
Reconstructing Context: Unexcavated Archaeological Objects in Early Medieval
Art and Suggested Approaches
11.50-12.30 Colleen Becker (Columbia University), The Turn Towards
“Cultural Studies”: The Case of Aby Warburg
12.30-13.10 Jannis Galanopoulos and Georgia Metaxa (Athens School of Fine
Art and University of Crete), Winckelmann, Archaeology and Art History in
Greece; So close, and yet so far Apart
13.10-14.00 LUNCH
PANEL 4
14.00-14.40 Leslie Brubaker (University of Birmingham), Inventing Byzantine
Iconoclasm
14.40-15.20 Heike Neumeister (Birmingham City University), On Art,
Anthropology and Making Modernist art History in Berlin 1913-1933
15.20 TEA
15.50-16.30 Jack Hartnell (The Courtauld Institute of Art, London), Osmosis
or Forensics? Art History and the Bleeding Boundaries of Medicine
16.30-17.10 Laura Camille Agoston (Trinity University, San Antonio),
Ephemeral Bodies, Rediscovered Texts and the Narratives of Art History
17.10 Matthew Rampley (University of Birmingham),
Concluding Thoughts
The Full Programme can be found at: http://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/negotiating-boundaries-schedule.pdf.
Fee:
Daily rate: £30 Full conference: £50
Students and unwaged: £10 daily rate
Contact: m.rampleybham.ac.uk
Reference:
CONF: Negotiating Boundaries (Birmingham, 1-2 Jul 13). In: ArtHist.net, Mar 24, 2013 (accessed May 23, 2025), <https://arthist.net/archive/4914>.