TOC 19.07.2009

Critical Inquiry Vol. 35, No. 4, Summer 2009

University of Chicago Press

University of Chicago Press Table of Contents Alert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Critical Inquiry
Volume 35, Number 4
(Summer 2009)

is now available at
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/toc/ci/35/4


Introduction: Doctrines, Disciplines, Discourses, Departments
James Chandler


What Is a Discipline?

Debating Disciplinarity
Robert Post


Critique, Dissent, Disciplinarity
Judith Butler


Case Studies I
Science Studies

Science Studies and the History of Science
Lorraine Daston


Postdisciplinary Liaisons: Science Studies and the Humanities
Mario Biagioli


Religious Studies

Religious Reason and Secular Affect: An Incommensurable Divide?
Saba Mahmood


Saint Paul and the New Man
Amy Hollywood


Case Studies II
Cinema Studies

The Core and the Flow of Film Studies
Dudley Andrew


Carnivore or Chameleon: The Fate of Cinema Studies
Gertrud Koch


Philology

Future Philology? The Fate of a Soft Science in a Hard World
Sheldon Pollock


The Double Fate of the Classics
François Hartog


The Disciplinary System

The General Enters the Library: A Note on Disciplines and Complexity
David E. Wellbery


The Conflicts of the Faculty
Marshall Sahlins


The Disciplines and the Arts

Project Statement
Helen Mirra


Art, Fate, and the Disciplines: Some Indicators
W. J. T. Mitchell


Counting (Art and Discipline)
Bill Brown


An Exchange on /The Norton Anthology of English Literature/ and Sean
Shesgreen

I.
Joanna Lipking


II.
An Incredible Shrunken History: A Response to Sean Shesgreen

Sandra M. Gilbert and Susan Gubar


III.
The Best That Has Been Bought and Stolen

David Damrosch


IV.
Surprised by Sin: A Response to Sean Shesgreen

Kelly J. Mays


V.
M. H. Abrams


VI.
W. Drake McFeely


VII.
Stephen Greenblatt


VIII.
Anthologies and Sausages

Sean Shesgreen


Eve Sedgwick, Once More
Lauren Berlant


Books of Critical Interest

Quellennachweis:
TOC: Critical Inquiry Vol. 35, No. 4, Summer 2009. In: ArtHist.net, 19.07.2009. Letzter Zugriff 08.09.2025. <https://arthist.net/archive/31719>.

^